Author: Aslıhan Azeri
In the economic crisis era, companies often use the term “cost-cutting” and implement “cost-cutting” strategies and measures in response to the austerity measures implemented in broader economic policy. Economists, including figures like Yanis Varoufakis, argue that austerity measures can have detrimental effects on business investment decisions. When consumers have less disposable income due to austerity measures, businesses may hesitate to invest in producing goods or services that people cannot afford to buy. This reluctance to invest can sustain a downward spiral, further weakening the economy and worsening the problems austerity measures were meant to address.
Companies facing economic uncertainty often reflexively respond by cutting costs. However, as with austerity, the overemphasis on cost-cutting may prioritize short-term gains over long-term sustainability. Despite their short-term necessity, these measures can yield extensive consequences, fostering tension among stakeholders, leaders, and employees.
Leaders are tasked with justifying their existence while finding ways to navigate the challenges of maintaining operations during cost cuts. To decide on tactic plans for cost-cutting strategy, top management continuously asks the leaders to justify the necessity of their departmental functions within the company’s hierarchy. This effort is not costless; it takes a lot of energy, effort, and money. With the survival instinct, the accuracy of justifications and metrics may become questionable, as they may be tailored to satisfy top management rather than reflect genuine organizational needs. Meanwhile, employees may experience increased workloads, job insecurity, and insufficient investment in their development and the company. Fear of job loss can obstruct innovation and increase turnover, further straining the organization.
According to The Barret Values Center, “cost-cutting” is identified as a Potentially Limiting Value/Term (PLV) to emphasize its adverse impact on company culture and long-term success. Such measures can corrode trust, foster fear and resentment, and diminish morale. Without consideration for its effects on innovation, product/service quality, and employee engagement, cost-cutting can impede return on investment and hinder adaptability in a dynamic market landscape.
The relationship between cost-cutting and economic austerity underscores the need for a more balanced, systematic approach to business management.
Rather than viewing cost-cutting as a universal solution, companies should assess its broader implications for culture and sustainability. Prioritizing strategic investment, fostering innovation, and eliminating waste to improve the efficiency of services and production processes can position businesses for success during economic uncertainty. While doing so, reflecting on and addressing the real needs with the communication strategy of these initiatives is crucial for a healthy, sustainable business and work environment.
